Of angelfish and ambiguity

Several days ago, I was viewing a poster of sorts with but two inherent flaws.

To the left, we see a depiction of a coral reef which appears to be thriving and, by extension, teeming with marine life.  Automatically, one notices species from the Paracanthurus, Amphiprion, and Chaetodon genera.  All seems well, thus far, we may agree.  However, look more closely, and you pick out Pterophyllum scalare floating jovially by.  Look towards the right-most corner of the image, and you may also note Symphysodon aequifasciatus cuddling into some anemones. This genuinely upsets me, as both of the aforementioned are widely-known freshwater species arising from the Amazon Basin.  Their being introduced to a saltwater community is entirely impossible.

That said, justification for this error may exist in the case of P. scalare. To introduce the ambiguous component of this posting, the aforementioned cichlid’s common name is “angelfish”.  However, members of the family Pomacanthidae (this containing a large quantity of marine species) are also colloquially termed “angelfish”.  Thus, a person wishing to locate an angelfish species to utilize in just such a display might be faced with both options and may, although unknowingly, insert a freshwater fish into a perilous albeit scenic seascape.

Pterophyllum scalare in an entirely unnatural setting.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Attempts at Humor, Biology. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Of angelfish and ambiguity

  1. Nao says:

    I like that biology geeks, too, have “wtf” moments when encountering the result of someone, who knows a little bit less than them, unwittingly dabbling in their field. 😀

    • Sophia says:

      Hahaha, well, I cannot truthfully be termed a “bio geek” – I’m far too n00b to bear that title. However, as a want-to-be biologist, I do cringe when faced with such a prominent lack of [quite literally] vital accuracy. I’ve seen such errors in many a place – I was simply unable to resist the urge to address this particular example, having lived alongside both of the aforementioned species at one point or another.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s